Technology and construction expertise, united to create smart buildings
With RevoSteel, the future of construction is already a reality.
RevoSteel is the new generation of construction, pushing the limits of reinforced concrete by proposing an ideal solution for all residential and tertiary applications. Designed to meet the needs of contemporary living, RevoSteel combines structural strength with material lightness, ensuring high performance in every context.
Integrated BIM Design
We adopt the BIM – Building Information Modeling methodology to create three-dimensional models that can be shared among all professionals involved, ensuring that every phase of construction is coordinated and controlled, from design to implementation.
The result is a more efficient, safe, and sustainable process.
Thanks to BIM we can:
- Optimize construction time and costs
- Minimize errors on site
- Simulate the building's behavior over time
- Evaluate and improve the project's environmental impact
Production technology and industrial quality
Each structural component is produced with advanced technologies equipped with maximum precision.
The RevoSteel system is based on prefabricated lightweight steel elements, tracked, controlled, and ready to be installed on site with speed and reliability.
Compared to traditional materials, CFS offers:
- Reduce loads and masses, essential for ensuring the best seismic performance
- Significantly reduced construction times
- Minimal site impact (less noise and dust)
Energy efficiency and sustainability
Building with RevoSteel means designing with a green perspective.
The entire system is designed to ensure high energy performance and reduce environmental impact.
We offer solutions that include:
- Integration with photovoltaic systems
- Advanced thermal and acoustic insulation systems
- Mechanical ventilation systems (MVHR) for improved living comfort
- Alignment with the latest environmental regulations
Comparison between construction systems
(CFS Revo, Wood, Traditional)
Note: the comparison is based on the structural core of the systems, excluding the thermal and acoustic performance related to the wall stratigraphy. Each item is ordered by strategic priority and compared between the three systems.
The symbol (from 1 to 3) indicates the relative performance: more stars, better behavior.
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Seismic resistance |
Excellent structural lightness and ductility |
Lightweight, but less performing for multi-storey buildings |
Heavy and rigid, less seismically efficient |
| 2. Speed of installation |
Reduced construction times compared to traditional methods with high precision of structures |
Fast, but with modular constraints and sensitive to weather dependence |
Long times, not easily guaranteed |
| 3. Moisture resistance |
Galvanized steel, dry, non-gyroscopic |
Vulnerable |
Good, but subject to degradation over time |
| 4. Design flexibility |
Good modularity and customization |
Normally constrained to predefined schemes |
Good |
| 5. Maintenance and durability |
Unalterable and not easily perishable over time, low maintenance costs |
Subject to biological and mechanical degradation, requires maintenance over time |
Good durability, but with strong criticalities and high maintenance costs |
| 6. Raw material cost and execution precision |
Optimized, thanks to the construction system |
Very variable depending on the lower flexibility of the system |
Competitive cost, but less precise |
| 7. Fire resistance |
Good |
High criticalities without fire treatments |
Good |
| 8. Sustainability and recyclability at the end of life |
Eco-circular: almost total recyclability, reduced waste |
Partial recyclability: the presence of glues and resins limits the possibility of a 'clean recycling' |
High environmental impact (cement, waste) not completely eco-circular |
| 9. Stratigraphic composability at equal cost |
High versatility in integrating high-performance solutions |
Good performance, but with thickness/cost limits |
High presence of thermal bridges: additional costly insulation is required for equivalent performance |
| 1. Seismic resistance | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional |
|
Excellent structural lightness and ductility |
Lightweight, but less performing for multi-storey buildings |
Heavy and rigid, less seismically efficient |
| 2. Speed of installation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional |
|
Reduced construction times compared to traditional methods with high precision of structures |
Fast, but with modular constraints and sensitive to weather dependence |
Long times, not easily guaranteed |
| 3. Moisture resistance | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional |
|
Galvanized steel, dry, non-gyroscopic |
Vulnerable |
Good, but subject to degradation over time |
| 4. Design flexibility | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional |
|
High modularity and customization |
Normally constrained to predefined schemes |
High customization |
| 5. Maintenance and durability | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional |
|
Unalterable and not easily perishable over time, low maintenance costs |
Subject to biological and mechanical degradation, requires maintenance over time |
Good durability, but with strong criticalities and high maintenance costs |
| 6. Raw material cost and execution precision | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional |
|
Optimized, thanks to the construction system |
Very variable depending on the lower flexibility of the system |
Competitive cost, but less precise |
| 7. Fire resistance | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional |
|
Good |
High criticalities without fire treatments |
Good |
| 8. Sustainability and recyclability at the end of life | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional |
|
Eco-circular: almost total recyclability, reduced waste |
Partial recyclability: the presence of glues and resins limits the possibility of a 'clean recycling' |
High environmental impact (cement, waste) not completely eco-circular |
| 9. Stratigraphic composability at equal cost | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revo in CFS | Wooden houses | Traditional |
|
High versatility in integrating high-performance solutions |
Good performance, but with thickness/cost limits |
High presence of thermal bridges: additional costly insulation is required for equivalent performance |
From this comparison, it can be seen that the Revo in CFS system excels in the most relevant structural, logistical and environmental factors for modern construction, offering an ideal balance between technical performance, sustainability and execution speed.